UT San Antonio Academic Innovation

Best Practices for Using Peerceptiv

Updated on

Overview

To maximize the benefits of Peerceptiv, instructors should clearly communicate expectations, integrate the platform seamlessly into course objectives, and provide guidance on constructive feedback. Setting up detailed rubrics and conducting a practice assignment can help students build confidence and improve the quality of peer reviews. Regularly monitoring submissions and offering feedback on student participation ensures a supportive and productive peer assessment environment. 

Design Thoughtful Rubrics  

  • Keep rubrics focused and accessible.  
  • Include criteria that students can apply reliably.  
  • Use examples in class to practice evaluating work with the rubric.  

Set Clear Expectations  

  • Use a syllabus statement to explain the purpose of peer review.  
  • Emphasize that participation in both submission and reviewing is graded.  
  • Reassure students that reviews are anonymous and constructive.  

Scaffold the Process  

  • Start with a low-stakes or practice review.  
  • Walk students through how to give and receive feedback.  
  • Use the first assignment to establish the culture of respectful peer learning.  

 Monitor Review Quality  

  • Use the Peerceptiv dashboard to track review scores and engagement.  
  • You can intervene if reviews are off-topic or missing.
  • Consider awarding points for quality reviews (Peerceptiv offers scoring for this).  

 Use Feedback for Revision  

  • Allow students to revise their work based on peer input.  
  • Encourage reflective assignments where students respond to the feedback received.  

Assignment Ideas  

  • Writing Courses: Draft essays, lab reports, or literature reviews.  
  • STEM Courses: Code reviews, data analysis, or engineering design reflections.  
  • Business/Communication: Presentation critiques, pitch decks, or strategic plans.  
  • Group Work: Combine with team member evaluation to improve accountability.  

Grading in Peerceptiv  

  • Assignment Score: Based on how peers evaluate the student’s submission.  
  • Review Score: Based on how accurate/helpful a student’s reviews are (compared to others).  
  • Task Completion: Tracks whether the student submitted/reviewed on time.  
  • Grades can be weighted and automatically pushed to the Canvas gradebook.  

Support

For support, Monday-Friday 8:30 a.m. – 5:00 p.m: email [email protected] or call 210-458-4520

Previous Article Getting Started with Peerceptiv (Students)
Next Article Best Practices for Using Peerceptiv for Students
Still Need Help? Contact Academic Innovation